Case Summaries
Tax Law
[10/10]
Wagner v. US In a claim for the return of funds allegedly wrongfully levied by the government, summary judgment for defendant is vacated and suit is dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction where there was no basis for jurisdiction under the Internal Revenue Code sections permitting claims for wrongful levy or substitution of value, or as a general third-party refund action.
[10/10]
Sturgeon v. County of Los Angeles In an action brought taxpayer-plaintiff challenging the validity of the benefits defendant-county provides to its superior court judges, grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant-county is reversed where: 1) the benefits provided by the county were compensation within the meaning of section 19, article VI of the Constitution; and 2) the record did not establish those benefits had been prescribed by the Legislature.
[10/08]
Jefferson v. US In a suit to recover back payroll taxes for a day-care center which were assessed personally against plaintiff-director, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff was a "responsible person"; 2) plaintiff willfully failed to pay the day care's taxes; 3) plaintiff was not exempt from the trust fund recovery penalty; 4) defendant was not estopped from assessing the tax against plaintiff; and 5) defendant's failure to turn over evidence did not preclude summary judgment.
More...
Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.
|